Things are slightly different with "anonymous" branches, in that they are not included in the hg branches output when they have been merged in, and so don't require explicit closing. If you want to know what difference is there between the two branches in mercurial. It is more visually instructive, I think, to see that you were merging from something you were happy with (and hence closed the branch prior to the merge). Lets say you have branch named branch-one and the other being default repo. However, when reopening a branch, the "bar" you see in Tortoise will still exist in the previously-closed changeset, and so for this reason alone I would personally opt for a close-then-merge policy. Rememeber that when you close a branch (using hg commit -close-branch or in Tortoise) you effectively just commit a new changeset where the change has a flag set to say that branch X is closed - you can easily update to the branch and re-open it by performing another commit. Things were different pre-1.5(?), but purely in the fact that hg heads and hg branches would include these "closed" branches in their output - they still can if you specify -c on the command. It would be over two standard centuries later before he found a reason to venture into this strange star maelstroms mercurial depths, a galactic phenomena. There is no real difference between the two methods when talking about named branches, at least in any recent version of Mercurial. You may look here for details on how we came to this conclusion. But mercurial gets another topological head. When one first merge and then close, the branch is close - all right, and human doesn't see that branch by default. As well certain number of them can cause 400 Bad Request from Mercurial running in IIS server. Merge heads, Merge two or more heads of a branch into a single head. TortoiseHg is a set of graphical applications and Windows Explorer shell extension that serve as a friendly front-end to the Mercurial distributed version control system (DVCS). Larger number of topological heads can (slightly, but still) affect performance - How do closed branches affect Mercurial performance?. Push all branches to a specific remote, rather than the default remote. And topological heads of that graph are used for logic implementation, for example while comparing local and remote repositories during hg pull. xslx2 so that I could still use the original functionality if needed by simply renaming my files. Find the existing xslx entry and delete or change the extension for it. Internally, Mercurial sees repository as a graph of changesets, DAG to be specific. Launch TortoiseGit settings (right click on desktop, TortoiseGit->Settings) and pick Diff Viewer. It does affect results of certain commands like hg branches omits closed ones, or hg push disallow addition of new head per branch by default. By default, this range is changes between the first non-outgoing parent of any revision in. The thing is for Mercurial branch names is a mere "metadata" for each changeset. In Mercurial, arc diff sends all commits in a range for review. This isn't a matter of taste and there's a difference.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |